Jump to content

BrianD

Member
  • Posts

    417
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by BrianD

  1. I know a fair amount about this subject.  The short answer is no, for a couple of reasons.

     

    First of all, there are about 30,000 nerve fibers in the cochlear nerve.  The neurolink device if I remember has about 1000 electrodes, but after implantation not all of them are functional.  And long term, all brain interface electrodes tend to have problems due to the foreign body response of the glial cells in the brain.  So even the basic technology does not have the frequency resolution needed for music appreciation.  If you know anyone with a cochlear implant they will tell you this, they can understand speech but music doesn’t sound right.

     

    But more importantly, auditory processing does not occur in a single region of the brain.  For example, when there is a sharp new sound you will automatically turn your head to that direction.  This is an automatic reflex occurring in the midbrain and is not part of the conscious perception of sound.  There are at least four areas of the brain involved in auditory processing, so  implanting electrodes in the final conscious processing part for sound will not really work.  I think that the first application of this technology will be for motion in paralyzed patients which is much simpler, more understood, and suited to this number of electrodes.

     

    The brain is very complicated.

     

    In the long run the answer is probably yes, as everything eventually becomes obsolete.  But I don’t think Neuralink will obsolete our hobby.

    • Thank You 2
  2. I have an opinion about why vinyl is sometimes preferred that I rarely see mentioned in these articles.  I haven’t made any measurements so I could be wrong, but here is what I think.

     

    I beleive that much of the difference is in how it was mixed, and how much dynamic range compression is used.  It is strange that a CD quality digital recording has the capacity for much more dynamic rangethan an LP, but it is rarely used.  If you are listening to any vintage vinyl, there was some compression just to get it to fit within the constraints of the media, but usually that was about it.  But the CD era was also the start of the loudness wars, and in the digital download era it is even worse.  Almost any popular music made in this century is really compressed and loud.  But when it is mixed for an LP, I think that the engineer knows that it won’t just be played over an iPhone speaker and cuts down the compression.  Then to someone who cares about sound quality, it sounds better.

     

    But in the end, I agree with what has already been said.  No matter what it is, enjoy the music.

    • Thank You 4
  3. Welcome to the site.

     

    I am sure someone here can help you with your amp.  If you have any knowledge and skills in electronics, you may be able to fix it yourself.  But if not, or just a beginner, for an amp I would suggest that your get help form one of the technicians here as there are potentially fatal voltage sources inside, even with it unplugged.

  4. The new site seems great, and is tremendously improved when used with my iPad.  I know that this new carversite took a lot of work, so I say

     

    THANK YOU TO:

     

    Nahash5150 - Administrator

    Gene C - Administrator

    B-Man - Administrator

    Daddyjt - Moderator

    Balok - Moderator

    Zumbini - Moderator

    Doh-R - Moderator 

    DennisMiller55 - Moderator

     

    • Thank You 9
  5. Happy New Year everyone!

     

    Just got back from the parade and lunch. Something about a marching band going by, how the sound changes, the physical sensation of the drum line, that I just really enjoy.

     

    For those of you freezing your huevos off, you have my sympathy.

    • Thank You 1
  6. I don’t have any UHQR, but certainly some MFSL vinyl. The ones that I personally bought new have been handled carefully and sound great. The ones that I bought used, some are good and some not so much. For example, I found a copy of Clapton’s Slowhand used for $20. The person that owned this only played one side I think, so one side is noisy, the other silent.

     

    If I buy a UHQR, I want it to be in great shape. So that means new, which until I have much more money won’t happen, or used. For used, I wouldn’t buy unless I could listen to it first.

     

    That is why I don’t have any UHQR, but if you have a brand new, sealed, dsotm, iRobot, crime of the century, or anything really, for $100, then I’m your man! Cash money!

    • Thank You 1
  7. I use many of those that you all have listed, but here are a few ones that I use that I didn’t see:

     

    Supertramp - Crime of the Century

    Lots of non-electrified instruments and big dynamic range

    Pink Floyd - Echoes

    Low end

    Holts the Planets - Mars

    One of my favorite pieces of symphony that I have heard live many times as a reference (the rest of the suite is meh)

    Marvin Gaye - What’s Going On

    I have a LP pressing of this that I found used, it is very old but not played much, and for some reason is one of the purest sounding pieces of vinyl that I have.

    • Thank You 1
×
×
  • Create New...